We intervene in European animal test case
This week we have sent expert scientific and legal arguments to the European Chemicals Agency to try and save up to 1000 rabbits from unnecessary tests.
Our observations are for a Board of Appeal case at the European Chemicals Agency.
The case was brought by Dutch chemical company Huntsman Holland, supported by BASF. Last year we were successful in being permitted to intervene in support of their case.
The company is objecting to a demand by the Agency to conduct a prenatal developmental toxicity test in rabbits. They Agency wants to know if the chemical is likely to cause abnormalities to the developing foetus.
The animal test would involve daily force-feeding of the chemical to pregnant rabbits during most of their pregnancy. The mothers are then killed the day before they are due to give birth. Their pups are extracted by caesarean section and examined for abnormalities before also being killed.
The company says that if they were forced to do the test they would end up killing up to 1,000 rabbits.
The company wants to use an alternative technique instead of the animal test, a strategy called ‘read-across’. They say that the Agency had ignored important information that supports their strategy – and is asking for an animal test that does not need to be done.
The substance to be tested is called propylene carbonate. The company has shown using alternative tests that it changes almost immediately in blood to propylene glycol which is not harmful to the developing foetus.
The European Chemicals Agency is responsible for the registration and authorisation of chemicals across Europe. It regularly asks for new animal tests to be done for some of the chemicals that are registered.
We closely monitor the activities of the Agency to ensure that they uphold the EU’s principle of ‘animal testing as a last resort’.
We submitted our legal and scientific comments in support of the company this week. An oral hearing in a few months is likely to follow. We’ll keep you updated…
More news on Chemicals
EU REACH
Europe’s largest animal testing programme
UK REACH
Ending animal testing for chemicals in the UK
Ending toxicity testing on dogs and monkeys
subtitle: Help us end the use of dogs and monkeys in experiments
End the trade in primates
subtitle: Thousands of monkeys are traded globally for research
The MAP Campaign
subtitle: Make Alternatives a Priority in the US
Save the dogs
subtitle: Help us stop the use of dogs in experiments
Replace Animal Tests: The UK RAT List
subtitle: 5 animal tests that should be replaced
5 animal tests that should be replaced
Replace Animal Tests: The RAT List
subtitle: 10 animal tests that should be replaced
10 animal tests that should be replaced
Make Their Voice Count
subtitle: Pledge to #MakeTheirVoiceCount in this administration.
Animals don’t speak our language, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have anything to say.
Making North America cruelty free
subtitle: Ending animal testing for cosmetics in North America
Global Cosmetics Campaign
subtitle: Ending cosmetics testing around the world
Poll: 72% of EU citizens want a phase-out plan for animal tests
subtitle: The use of chemical agents within animal testing
Support the HEARTS Act
subtitle: Ask your US Representative to support the HEARTS Act
The HEARTS Act will prioritize the use of humane and effective alternatives to animals in experiments funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Support the Humane Cosmetics Act
subtitle: Ask your US Representative to support the Humane Cosmetics Act.
If you live in the US you can help by contacting your US Senator and asking them to support the Humane Cosmetics Act
Help us #SendSurvivorsHome by supporting the CARE Act
subtitle: Ask your US Representative to support the CARE Act.
Over 200,000 dogs, cats, and rabbits are used in experiments each year in the United States. The Companion Animal Release from Experiments (CARE) Act will ensure that dogs, cats, and rabbits are placed in loving homes